 |
Do We Need These Minerals?
By WLR Dietitian
|
Do we actually need the six minerals that are currently
excluded from the positive list and if so what foods supply
them and how much do we need?
As part of their review, the Expert Group on Vitamins and
Minerals has put together recommendations on these six
minerals. Here’s a summary of their findings for each…
Tin
There’s insufficient proof to suggest this is an essential
mineral, although claims have been made that it delays hair
and hearing loss. Meanwhile, there’s no evidence to suggest
that any groups of the population are deficient in tin and
consequently, no recommended daily intakes for this mineral
have been set. Furthermore, the presence of tin in food is
generally considered to be a contaminant.
WLR’s conclusion: nutrition experts don’t believe we
need this mineral and so it’s unlikely to be added to the
‘positive list.’
Silicon
Silicon is considered to be an essential nutrient, needed
for the formation of bone and connective tissue. However,
deficiencies have not been seen in humans and so
recommendations on adequate intakes have not been set. Grains
such as oats, barley and rice are good sources of silicon.
Meanwhile, different forms of silicon are found in drinking
water and are used in food additives.
WLR’s conclusion: Future research may result in
daily recommended amounts being set and in the future, we may
see this mineral being added to the ‘positive list’.
Nickel
There are no recommended amounts for this mineral, which is
linked to iron absorption, and deficiencies have not been seen
in humans. However, side effects linked to excessive amounts
are relatively common. It’s thought that people with iron
deficiency – a condition that may affect around 40 percent of
women aged 19-34 years – may be especially vulnerable to the
increased absorption of nickel and may become sensitive to
this mineral, which in turn is linked to eczema and other skin
complaints. Nickel is found in pulses, oats and nuts and
smaller amounts are found in drinking water. However, the
amounts found in food are unlikely to be linked to health
problems.
WLR’s conclusion: It’s unlikely nickel will make it
onto the ‘positive list’ as many people appear to be sensitive
to this mineral and the absorption of nickel is greater when
taken on an empty stomach, as often occurs with
supplementation.
Boron
The World Health Organisation provides an acceptable range
for boron intake, but in the UK, there are no guidelines on
suitable intakes. Nevertheless, boron is considered to be an
essential nutrient and helps the body make use of the calcium,
copper, magnesium, glucose and fats in the food we eat. It’s
also been shown to alleviate some of the symptoms of osteo-
and rheumatoid arthritis. Meanwhile, more research is needed
to confirm deficiency states that have currently been linked
to impaired brain function and a disease that causes severe
joint deformity. Boron is present in nuts, fresh fruit, green
veg and drinking water.
WLR’s conclusion: Boron may make it onto the
‘positive list’ and in the future we may see recommended
intakes being set.
Cobalt
There are no recommended intake for cobalt as this mineral
is an integral part of vitamin B12, for which recommendations
are made. Cobalt is an essential mineral but deficiencies
haven’t been seen in humans. It’s found in fish, nuts, green
leafy veg and fresh cereals and is generally not used in food
supplements.
WLR’s conclusion: It’s unlikely this mineral will
make it onto the ‘positive list’ in view of the fact it’s
rarely used in supplements anyway.
Vanadium
There’s no proof this is an essential nutrient and so there
are no recommendations for suitable intakes. No specific
function for this mineral has been found in humans and signs
of deficiency remain questionable, although it’s been
suggested that low intakes may be linked with heart disease.
The best dietary sources of vanadium are spinach, parsley,
mushrooms and oysters, although wholegrains, seafood, meats
and dairy products also contain reasonable amounts.
WLR’s conclusion: It’s highly unlikely this mineral
will be added to the ‘positive list’ in view of the lack of
evidence to suggest it’s needed for good health.
|